Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 40 • VG SZ III 2021 40 Generato dall'IA

Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed Based on Child's Best Interests

Numero d'incarto III 2021 40
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a decision made by a child and adult protective authority concerning their custody arrangement, but the court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to modify the custody arrangement was based on a thorough review of the child's best interests and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the authority erred in its factual findings or legal application regarding the necessity of the change.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed Based on Child's Best Interests: A petitioner challenged a decision made by a child and adult protective authority concerning their custody arrangement, but the court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to modify the custody arrangement was based on a thorough review of the child's best interests and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the authority erred in its factual findings or legal application regarding the necessity of the change.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interesse del figlio modifica dell'autorità parentale mutamento della residenza del minore impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio diritto di visita sorvegliato procedura d'adozione
Generato dall'IA
III 2016 7
Appeal Regarding Modification of Child Custody
III 2018 225
Child Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed
III 2019 142
Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2021 82
Mother's Appeal Against Child Protection Custody Order Dismissed

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 40 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 28. April 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n