Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 22 • VG SZ III 2021 22 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Inadmissible: Non-Final Agency Decision on Protective Services Reports

Numero d'incarto III 2021 22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought review after a lower authority, an authority for child and adult protective services, refused to approve reports concerning their legal status. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the decision regarding the non-approval of the reports did not constitute a final decision that could be appealed under the relevant procedural law, as the underlying protective measure remained in force and the matter was still pending before the authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Inadmissible: Non-Final Agency Decision on Protective Services Reports: The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the decision regarding the non-approval of the reports did not constitute a final decision that could be appealed under the relevant procedural law, as the underlying protective measure remained in force and the matter was still pending before the authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
approvazione del rapporto controllo della procedura potere discrezionale del compilatore/valutatore statuto giuridico decisione informale inosservanza delle prescrizioni di controllo
Generato dall'IA
III 2021 83
Appeal Regarding Interim Approval of Reports Under Adult Protection Law
III 2023 139
Appeal Against Approval of Protected Person's Financial Management Report
III 2021 95
Appeal of Protective Services Decision
III 2022 192
Appeal Against Guardian's Report Approval Regarding Minor's Right to be Heard
III 2020 50
Appeal Regarding Guardianship Report and Visitation Rights Under Child and Adult Protection Law

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 22 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Nicht-Genehmigung von Berichten nach