Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2021 196 • VG SZ III 2021 196 Generato dall'IA

Claimant Denied Victim Compensation for Insufficient Injury Threshold

Numero d'incarto III 2021 196
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A claimant sought victim compensation (Genugtuung) under victim support legislation, which was denied by the initial authority. The authority's denial was based on the finding that the claimant's alleged injuries did not meet the threshold for requiring official intervention or assistance, as the incident did not constitute a serious violation of personal rights under the relevant statute. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the statute's prerequisite for compensation—a significant impairment of personal integrity due to criminal conduct—was not met by the facts presented, thus justifying the refusal of the requested compensation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant Denied Victim Compensation for Insufficient Injury Threshold: The authority's denial was based on the finding that the claimant's alleged injuries did not meet the threshold for requiring official intervention or assistance, as the incident did not constitute a serious violation of personal rights under the relevant statute. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the statute's prerequisite for compensation—a significant impairment of personal integrity due to criminal conduct—was not met by the facts presented, thus justifying the refusal of the requested compensation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità per menomazione dell'integrità diritti della vittima reato penale raggiungimento del valore soglia vittima di infortunio diritto al risarcimento danni Opferhilfe (Genugtuung) | Opferhilfe

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was cited in the dispositive regarding the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 196 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Gesundheit und Soziales, Kollegiumstrasse 28, Postfach 2161, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Opferhilfe (Genugtuung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: