Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 174 • VG SZ III 2021 174 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions

Numero d'incarto III 2021 174
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal challenging administrative decisions by cantonal and district authorities concerning spatial planning or zoning regulations, where the appellants contested the legal basis or application of the decisions made by lower administrative bodies. The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned that the challenged administrative actions were consistent with the relevant planning law and regulations, finding that the authorities acted within their delegated authority and that the factual findings and subsequent legal application supported the contested outcome, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions: The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned that the challenged administrative actions were consistent with the relevant planning law and regulations, finding that the authorities acted within their delegated authority and that the factual findings and subsequent legal application supported the contested outcome, thereby dismissing the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prescrizioni di zona domanda indirizzata all'autorità base fattuale decisione delegata principi pianificatori approvazione dei piani

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court ordered the appellants to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 91
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions
III 2019 231
Spatial Planning Dispute: Municipal and Cantonal Decisions Challenged
III 2023 31
Cantonal Land Use Planning Appeal Decision Upheld
III 2018 190
Spatial Planning and Zoning Appeals
III 2019 217
Spatial Planning Dispute Appeal Dismissed

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellants to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 174 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n 2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch RA lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n