Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 164 • VG SZ III 2021 164 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Cantonal Administrative Ruling on Procedural Deadlines

Numero d'incarto III 2021 164
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company appealed a decision regarding a cantonal administrative ruling, where the core issue involved the interpretation and application of specific provisions governing the administrative process. The court reasoned that the administrative body correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions concerning procedural deadlines and the scope of judicial review, finding that the appellant had failed to demonstrate a substantive error or a violation of the right to be heard, thereby upholding the original administrative decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal of Cantonal Administrative Ruling on Procedural Deadlines: The court reasoned that the administrative body correctly applied the relevant statutory provisions concerning procedural deadlines and the scope of judicial review, finding that the appellant had failed to demonstrate a substantive error or a violation of the right to be heard, thereby upholding the original administrative decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di essere sentito violazione dei diritti procedurali termini legali errore amministrativo sindacato giurisdizionale ritardi procedurali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The costs of the federal appeal were assessed against the losing party.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 207
Appeal of Cantonal Administrative Decision Regarding Statutory Authority and Procedure
III 2022 24
Appeal Against Cantonal Administrative Decision Affirmed
III 2022 171
Appeal Against Interlocutory Decision on Municipal and Cantonal Administrative Actions
III 2010 115
Administrative Appeal Against District and Cantonal Council Decisions
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The costs of the federal appeal were assessed against the losing party.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 164 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Departement des Innern, Kollegiumstrasse 28, \n Postfach 2160, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n