Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 159 • VG SZ III 2021 159 Generato dall'IA

Spousal Residency Retention Post-Divorce Integration Requirements

Numero d'incarto III 2021 159
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual appealed a decision by a cantonal executive body, which itself upheld a migration authority's refusal to grant residency, concerning the requirements for maintaining residency status based on marriage. The court reasoned that for the spouse of a citizen to retain residency rights after divorce, the marriage must have lasted for at least three years prior to the separation, and the applicant must demonstrate sufficient integration into the country, which was not sufficiently established in this case as the applicant had not actively pursued language courses or sought employment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Spousal Residency Retention Post-Divorce Integration Requirements: The court reasoned that for the spouse of a citizen to retain residency rights after divorce, the marriage must have lasted for at least three years prior to the separation, and the applicant must demonstrate sufficient integration into the country, which was not sufficiently established in this case as the applicant had not actively pursued language courses or sought employment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
coniuge inserimento professionale diritto di ritenzione obbligo di residenza divorzio internazionale misure cautelari nel divorzio
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 76
Residence Status Appeal After Divorce
III 2022 109
Residency Status Revocation Upheld Due to Insufficient Integration
III 2020 45
Residence Permit Revocation After Short Marriage Separation
III 2020 10
Residence Permit Revocation Upheld Despite Post-Marital Hardship Claim
III 2022 188
Residence Permit Revocation Following Separation Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 159 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 20. Dezember 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Amt für Migration, Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n

\n\n

\n