Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 145 • VG SZ III 2021 145 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Adjustment of Protective Representation and Consent Requirements

Numero d'incarto III 2021 145
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority regarding the adjustment of a protective representation concerning matters requiring consent. The court reached its verdict based on the legal framework governing protective representations and the specific requirements for consent in relation to the protected person's capacity and the nature of the business requiring approval.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Adjustment of Protective Representation and Consent Requirements: The court reached its verdict based on the legal framework governing protective representations and the specific requirements for consent in relation to the protected person's capacity and the nature of the business requiring approval.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità di protezione degli adulti messa in pericolo del bene del figlio rappresentanza legale godimento dei diritti civili diritto di visita decisione quadro

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs of the appeal proceedings were imposed on the appellant.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 221
Appeal of Child Protection Measure Adjustment
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2021 83
Appeal Regarding Interim Approval of Reports Under Adult Protection Law
III 2019 150
Appeal Regarding Protective Measures for a Minor

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs of the appeal proceedings were imposed on the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 145 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. Oktober 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Simone Höfliger, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n ZGB (Anpassung einer Vertretungsbeistandschaft/ zustimmungs­bedürftiges Geschäft nach