Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2021 133 • VG SZ III 2021 133 Generato dall'IA

Property Owners v. District Council Regarding Sewage Maintenance Contract Termination

Numero d'incarto III 2021 133
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of property owners appealed a decision concerning the maintenance of a sewage line, specifically the termination of a maintenance contract by the district council, which was upheld by the cantonal governmental council. The court reasoned that the termination of the maintenance contract was lawful because the original contract was based on a specific statutory provision that had been superseded by new legislation granting the municipality the exclusive right to operate and maintain public sewage facilities, thus rendering the prior private maintenance agreement invalid and justifying its unilateral termination by the responsible public authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Property Owners v. District Council Regarding Sewage Maintenance Contract Termination: The court reasoned that the termination of the maintenance contract was lawful because the original contract was based on a specific statutory provision that had been superseded by new legislation granting the municipality the exclusive right to operate and maintain public sewage facilities, thus rendering the prior private maintenance agreement invalid and justifying its unilateral termination by the responsible public authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contratto di manutenzione proprietà privata convenzione di risoluzione diritto legale tasse di allacciamento fognario stato della cosa locata
Generato dall'IA
II 2018 6
Municipality v. Property Owners: Drainage Infrastructure Contribution Timing
II 2018 4
Property Owner v. Municipal Council (Sewage and Refuse Fees Assessment)
III 2023 10
Property Owner v. Municipality on Sewage Connection Fee Assessment
II 2010 50
Appeal Regarding Development Contributions for Electrical and Sewage Infrastructure Costs.
II 2022 62
Company v. Municipal Council on Sewage Connection Fees

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2021 133 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Februar 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________, \n9. I.________, \n10. J.________, \n11. K.________, \n12. L.________, \n13. M.________, \n14. N.________, \n15. O.________, \n16. P.________, A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. Q.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Umweltschutzrecht (Unterhalt Schmutzwasserleitung: Kündigung Unterhaltsvertrag) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: