Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 98 • VG SZ III 2020 98 Generato dall'IA

Construction Project Appeals Consolidation

Numero d'incarto III 2020 98
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves multiple parties challenging a decision regarding a construction project, with two sets of appellants bringing separate appeals against a respondent entity, which is also an appellant in one of the linked proceedings against the initial objectors. The court's reasoning is not detailed in the provided excerpt, as it only sets out the case identifiers, date of the decision, composition of the judging panel, and the identities of the involved parties and their representatives.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Construction Project Appeals Consolidation: The court's reasoning is not detailed in the provided excerpt, as it only sets out the case identifiers, date of the decision, composition of the judging panel, and the identities of the involved parties and their representatives.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contratto di costruzione complessità della procedura decisioni di associazioni di imprese eccezioni processuali sentenze interpretative legittimazione a ricorrere
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 8
Building Permit Challenge and Appeals Consolidation
III 2019 52
Consolidated Appeals Regarding Building Permit and Pile Foundation Requirements
III 2024 6
Construction Consortium v. Highway Procurement Award
ZK2 2019 9
Case Concerning Preliminary Evidence Collection for Construction Defects
BEK 2023 1
Consolidated Appeals Regarding Municipal Fines for Uncompleted Construction and Timeliness of Objections

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 98 |\n |\n \n\n

\n III 2020 99 \n III 2020 100 \n III 2020 108 \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. April 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ und B.________ \n Beschwerdeführer im Verfahren III 2020 98, \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, \n Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n Beschwerdeführer im Verfahren III 2020 99, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, \n Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. K.________AG, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt L.________, \n Konzernrechtsdienst K.________AG, \n Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n