Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 91 • VG SZ III 2020 91 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions

Numero d'incarto III 2020 91
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by local and cantonal authorities concerning spatial planning and development, where the appellants challenged the underlying administrative actions regarding land use. The court reasoned that the administrative decisions were permissible under the relevant planning regulations and legal frameworks, affirming the prior rulings because the authorities had acted within their discretionary powers and respected established procedural and substantive planning law requirements, thus upholding the lower decisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning and Land Use Decisions: The court reasoned that the administrative decisions were permissible under the relevant planning regulations and legal frameworks, affirming the prior rulings because the authorities had acted within their discretionary powers and respected established procedural and substantive planning law requirements, thus upholding the lower decisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
utilizzazione del fondo presupposto processuale principi pianificatori ente locale decisione quadro autorità amministrativa Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant must bear the costs of the federal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 31
Cantonal Land Use Planning Appeal Decision Upheld
III 2018 190
Spatial Planning and Zoning Appeals
III 2021 174
Appeal Against Cantonal Zoning Decisions
III 2019 217
Spatial Planning Dispute Appeal Dismissed
III 2023 5
Appeal Regarding Spatial Planning Approval of Commercial Development

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant must bear the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 91 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. November 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________ bestehend aus: \n a) C.________, b) D.________, c) E.________, diese vertreten durch D.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lauerz, Husmatt 1, 6424 Lauerz, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n