Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2020 84 • VG SZ III 2020 84 Generato dall'IA

Social Welfare Authority v. Father (Child Custody Modification)

Numero d'incarto III 2020 84
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A social welfare authority appealed a decision concerning the custody and maintenance obligations for a minor, whose primary care had been transferred to the father following the parents' separation, based on the child's wish to live with the father and the assessment that this arrangement served the child's best interests, even though the mother had initially been granted custody. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to transfer custody to the father was factually sound and legally correct, as it appropriately considered the child's stated preference and the comprehensive evaluation supporting the conclusion that the existing placement maximized the child's welfare and development, thereby meeting the threshold for modification under relevant family law principles.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Social Welfare Authority v. Father (Child Custody Modification): The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authority's decision to transfer custody to the father was factually sound and legally correct, as it appropriately considered the child's stated preference and the comprehensive evaluation supporting the conclusion that the existing placement maximized the child's welfare and development, thereby meeting the threshold for modification under relevant family law principles.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
modifica del mantenimento del figlio interesse del figlio trasferimento della custodia doveri di famiglia autorità parentale decisione motivata Sozialhilfe (Berücksichtigung von Wohnkosten / Mietzinsanteil) | Sozialhilfe

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision determines the costs assessed against the losing party in the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 84 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. August 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n Fürsorgebehörde A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n verbeiständet durch C.________, \n |\n

\n\n

\n