Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 75 • VG SZ III 2020 75 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Commercial Permit Denial Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2020 75
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The matter concerned an appeal against a decision regarding the granting of a permit for commercial operations, where the appellants challenged the administrative body's ruling. The court reasoned that the appeal was unfounded because the administrative decision was based on a correct interpretation and application of the relevant planning and zoning laws, specifically finding that the proposed activities complied with public interest regulations and did not infringe upon any protected rights of the appellants, thus upholding the original decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Commercial Permit Denial Upheld: The court reasoned that the appeal was unfounded because the administrative decision was based on a correct interpretation and application of the relevant planning and zoning laws, specifically finding that the proposed activities complied with public interest regulations and did not infringe upon any protected rights of the appellants, thus upholding the original decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
attività commerciale applicazione delle leggi prescrizioni di zona legittimazione a contestare licenza sfratto da locali commerciali legittimazione a ricorrere Öffentlichkeit der Verwaltung / Datenschutz (Akteneinsicht) | Verschiedenes

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court ordered the appellants to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
II 2024 91
Construction Permit Denial Appeal Upheld
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2024 139
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellants to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 72+75 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. November 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. Dr. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (Verfahren III 2020 72+75), |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz (Verfahren III 2020 72), \n2. Volkswirtschaftsdepartement, Bahnhofstrasse 15, \n Postfach 1180, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Amt für Wirtschaft, Bahnhofstrasse 15, Postfach 1187, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2020 75) |\n

\n\n

\n