Appeal Against Provisional Road Traffic Seizure Order
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a provisional seizure order issued by the traffic authority concerning road traffic law. The appellant sought the reversal of this order, which was presumably enacted due to a safety concern or infraction related to driving. The court, in its decision, upheld the provisional measure, reasoning that the factual basis provided by the authority supported the necessity of the immediate protective measure against the appellant, thereby justifying the initial seizure order in the interest of public safety on the roads.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Against Provisional Road Traffic Seizure Order: The appellant sought the reversal of this order, which was presumably enacted due to a safety concern or infraction related to driving. The court, in its decision, upheld the provisional measure, reasoning that the factual basis provided by the authority supported the necessity of the immediate protective measure against the appellant, thereby justifying the initial seizure order in the interest of public safety on the roads.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 70 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n
\n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n|\n |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n A.________, …, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, \n B.________, , |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, B.________ 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n
\n \n
Sachverhalt: