Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2020 70 • VG SZ III 2020 70 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Provisional Road Traffic Seizure Order

Numero d'incarto III 2020 70
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a provisional seizure order issued by the traffic authority concerning road traffic law. The appellant sought the reversal of this order, which was presumably enacted due to a safety concern or infraction related to driving. The court, in its decision, upheld the provisional measure, reasoning that the factual basis provided by the authority supported the necessity of the immediate protective measure against the appellant, thereby justifying the initial seizure order in the interest of public safety on the roads.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Provisional Road Traffic Seizure Order: The appellant sought the reversal of this order, which was presumably enacted due to a safety concern or infraction related to driving. The court, in its decision, upheld the provisional measure, reasoning that the factual basis provided by the authority supported the necessity of the immediate protective measure against the appellant, thereby justifying the initial seizure order in the interest of public safety on the roads.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto della circolazione stradale ordine del pignoramento confisca del veicolo a motore minaccia per la sicurezza pubblica controllo di polizia provvedimenti provvisori Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 70 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n

\n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, …, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, \n B.________, , |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, B.________ 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: