Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 69 • VG SZ III 2020 69 Generato dall'IA

Traffic Authority v. Petitioner Regarding Driving Privilege Seizure

Numero d'incarto III 2020 69
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a preliminary seizure of their driving privileges by the traffic authority, which occurred after the petitioner was cited for dangerous driving, specifically for allegedly driving a vehicle with heavily worn tires that presented a danger to traffic safety. The court upheld the administrative measure, reasoning that the immediate endangerment posed by the severely worn tires to road safety warranted the swift, precautionary withdrawal of the driving license, even pending final determination of the underlying offense.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Traffic Authority v. Petitioner Regarding Driving Privilege Seizure: The court upheld the administrative measure, reasoning that the immediate endangerment posed by the severely worn tires to road safety warranted the swift, precautionary withdrawal of the driving license, even pending final determination of the underlying offense.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre sequestro del veicolo sicurezza stradale contravvenzione alla circolazione guida in stato di inattitudine uso del telefono cellulare alla guida Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was used to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 110
Traffic Authority v. Petitioner Regarding Provisional Driving License Seizure
III 2021 12
Traffic Authority v. Driver Regarding License Seizure
III 2018 172
Traffic Authority v. License Holder (Preliminary Seizure Appeal)
III 2019 202
Traffic Authority v. Driver (Provisional License Seizure)
III 2022 122
Appeal Against Driving Privilege Withdrawal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was used to order the appellant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 69 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: