Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2020 60 • VG SZ III 2020 60 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against KESB Decision on Financial Measures in Child and Adult Protection

Numero d'incarto III 2020 60
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority (KESB) regarding the execution of measures in child and adult protection law, specifically the obtaining of bank statements and the approval of reports and accounts. The court's reasoning, which is not fully detailed in the provided snippet but implied by the subject matter, would involve reviewing the KESB's decision on the necessity and proportionality of compelling financial disclosures (bank statements) and the formal approval of financial documentation related to the protected person or ward's estate, to ensure compliance with statutory duties and the best interests of the individual under protection.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against KESB Decision on Financial Measures in Child and Adult Protection: The court's reasoning, which is not fully detailed in the provided snippet but implied by the subject matter, would involve reviewing the KESB's decision on the necessity and proportionality of compelling financial disclosures (bank statements) and the formal approval of financial documentation related to the protected person or ward's estate, to ensure compliance with statutory duties and the best interests of the individual under protection.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità di protezione degli adulti misure di protezione dei minori conti finanziari obbligo legale diritto bancario approvazione del rapporto
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 60 und 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. September 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) …, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

\n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Ersatzvornahme: Einholung von Bankauskünften/ Genehmigung von Bericht und Rechnung nach