Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2020 6 • VG SZ III 2020 6 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2020 6
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a decision from a child and adult protection authority concerning the care and custody of a minor. The appellant challenged the prior ruling, which likely involved restrictions or changes to parental rights or responsibilities regarding the child. The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned based on the established legal standards and the specific facts of the case concerning the child's best interests, ultimately upholding or modifying the authority's decision based on the evidence presented regarding the child's welfare and the suitability of the involved parties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision: The appellant challenged the prior ruling, which likely involved restrictions or changes to parental rights or responsibilities regarding the child. The court, in reaching its verdict, reasoned based on the established legal standards and the specific facts of the case concerning the child's best interests, ultimately upholding or modifying the authority's decision based on the evidence presented regarding the child's welfare and the suitability of the involved parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interesse del figlio autorità di protezione degli adulti autorità parentale protezione del figlio diritto acquisito perizia giuridica
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 6 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. April 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) C.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. D.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n