Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 59 • VG SZ III 2020 59 Generato dall'IA

Petitioners v. Cantonal Migration Office and Government (2020)

Numero d'incarto III 2020 59
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved two petitioners, one of whom was a Portuguese national, challenging decisions made by the Cantonal Migration Office and the Cantonal Government regarding their status, with the specific nature of the challenged decision not fully detailed but implying an administrative action concerning residence or status within the jurisdiction, and the court ultimately reached its decision on June 8, 2020, based on its review of the administrative proceedings and applicable law, as is typical in appeals against cantonal administrative migration rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Petitioners v. Cantonal Migration Office and Government (2020): The case involved two petitioners, one of whom was a Portuguese national, challenging decisions made by the Cantonal Migration Office and the Cantonal Government regarding their status, with the specific nature of the challenged decision not fully detailed but implying an administrative action concerning residence or status within the jurisdiction, and the court ultimately reached its decision on June 8, 2020, based on its review of the administrative proceedings and applicable law, as is typical in appeals against cantonal administrative migration rulings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statuto di dimora Segreteria di Stato della migrazione azione di stato civile revisione in materia d'asilo e-government libera circolazione delle persone Ausländerrecht (Familiennachzug) | Ausländerrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the federal appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 131
Cantonal Council and Welfare Authority Review
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2019 92
Cantonal Asylum Review and Deportation Affirmation
III 2021 81
Appeal Between Municipalities Concerning Cantonal Government Involvement
III 2022 171
Appeal Against Interlocutory Decision on Municipal and Cantonal Administrative Actions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

This provision was cited to regulate the costs of the federal appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, Staatsangehöriger von Portugal, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13 \n Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n