Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 55 • VG SZ III 2020 55 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Child Protection Care Arrangement Decision

Numero d'incarto III 2020 55
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party contested a decision by a child and adult protection authority regarding the care arrangements for a child, appealing the ruling to a higher court. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the prior ruling was based on a comprehensive assessment of the child's best interests, encompassing necessary protective measures and suitable living conditions, thereby finding no grounds to overturn the authority's expert evaluation and legal application regarding the custody arrangement.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Child Protection Care Arrangement Decision: The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the prior ruling was based on a comprehensive assessment of the child's best interests, encompassing necessary protective measures and suitable living conditions, thereby finding no grounds to overturn the authority's expert evaluation and legal application regarding the custody arrangement.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interesse del figlio protezione del figlio autorità di protezione degli adulti condizioni di vita spese per la protezione dei minori contratto d'assistenza
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2019 142
Appeal Regarding Child Custody Arrangement Upheld
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 80
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Placement Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 10. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. C.________, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n |\n

\n\n

\n