Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 50 • VG SZ III 2020 50 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Guardianship Report and Visitation Rights Under Child and Adult Protection Law

Numero d'incarto III 2020 50
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority regarding the supervision of an individual, specifically challenging the approval of a guardian's report, the regulation of personal visitation rights, and directives issued under guardianship law. The court's reasoning, resulting in the decision of April 24, 2020, must have addressed the merits of the challenges to the authority's determinations concerning the appointed guardian's report, the established visitation schedule, and any specific instructions given, ultimately upholding or modifying the lower authority's findings within the scope of child and adult protection statutes.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Prüfung und Genehmigung des Berichts des Beistands/ Regelung des persönlichen Verkehrs/ Weisungen nach Art. 307 ZGB) | Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità tutoria messa in pericolo del bene del figlio esercizio del diritto di visita protezione degli adulti tutore diritto acquisito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision was applied to decide on the allocation of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2022 192
Appeal Against Guardian's Report Approval Regarding Minor's Right to be Heard
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision was applied to decide on the allocation of court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 50 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

\n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Prüfung und Genehmigung des Berichts des Beistands/ Regelung des persönlichen Verkehrs/ Weisungen nach