Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 33 • VG SZ III 2020 33 Generato dall'IA

Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2020 33
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by a traffic authority that revoked a driver's license due to a traffic offense. The appellant challenged the revocation, arguing insufficient grounds or proportionality. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the established facts demonstrated a sufficiently serious violation of traffic regulations justifying the security withdrawal measure to ensure road safety, thereby affirming the original administrative ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld: The appellant challenged the revocation, arguing insufficient grounds or proportionality. The court upheld the authority's decision, reasoning that the established facts demonstrated a sufficiently serious violation of traffic regulations justifying the security withdrawal measure to ensure road safety, thereby affirming the original administrative ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione alle norme della circolazione revoca della decisione amministrativa revoca della licenza condurre sicurezza della circolazione stradale corsa di controllo confisca del veicolo a motore Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 40
Driver's License Revocation Appeal Upheld
III 2019 159
Driver License Revocation Appeal Upheld
III 2018 26
Driver License Revocation Upheld
III 2019 219
License Revocation Appeal Upheld
III 2021 204
Traffic Authority License Revocation Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 3. Juni 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: