Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 31 • VG SZ III 2020 31 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Child Protection Authority Decision Regarding Loan and Real Estate Sale

Numero d'incarto III 2020 31
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a decision by a child and adult protection authority concerning a loan agreement and the sale of real estate related to child welfare matters. The specific facts revolve around a financial transaction, likely a loan secured by property, which fell under the authority's oversight due to its impact on the welfare of a child or protected adult. The court's reasoning, though not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, would focus on whether the authority correctly assessed the financial transaction's necessity, appropriateness, and consequences regarding the mandated protective duties for the concerned individual when reviewing the loan agreement and property disposition.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Child Protection Authority Decision Regarding Loan and Real Estate Sale: The specific facts revolve around a financial transaction, likely a loan secured by property, which fell under the authority's oversight due to its impact on the welfare of a child or protected adult. The court's reasoning, though not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, would focus on whether the authority correctly assessed the financial transaction's necessity, appropriateness, and consequences regarding the mandated protective duties for the concerned individual when reviewing the loan agreement and property disposition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sostanza del figlio autorità di protezione degli adulti messa in pericolo del bene del figlio negozi immobiliari contratto di mutuo sostanza immobiliare
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2019 16
Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Appeal
III 2020 169
Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 31 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 8. April 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n verbeiständet durch B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) C.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Darlehensvertrag / \n Verkauf einer Liegenschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: