Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 28 • VG SZ III 2020 28 Generato dall'IA

Building Density and Spatial Planning Compliance in Replacement Construction Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2020 28
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a municipal building authority's decision, upheld by subsequent cantonal administrative bodies, which refused permission to replace an existing building with a larger one, citing that the proposed structure exceeded the established building zone's density limits and did not conform to the spatial development plan's requirements regarding the building's intended use and footprint. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed replacement building, despite being an alteration, constituted a significant expansion that violated the existing spatial planning framework which limits construction volumes and density, and that the lower building volume permitted by the zoning must be respected even in replacement construction.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Building Density and Spatial Planning Compliance in Replacement Construction Appeal: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the proposed replacement building, despite being an alteration, constituted a significant expansion that violated the existing spatial planning framework which limits construction volumes and density, and that the lower building volume permitted by the zoning must be respected even in replacement construction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla zona piano di costruzione legge sulla pianificazione territoriale autorità comunali indice di sfruttamento altezza massima dell'edificio Planungs- und Baurecht (Farb- und Materialkonzept) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 110
Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations
III 2019 87
Local Authority Zoning Compliance Appeal
III 2025 53
Appeal Against Increased Development Density Approval
III 2017 172
Zoning Permit Denial for Excessive Building Mass Upheld
III 2017 140
Appeal of Denial of Construction Permits Based on Landscape Integration and Building Volume

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 28 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. August 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirk Einsiedeln, Bauund Umweltbehörde, \n Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n