Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2020 27 • VG SZ III 2020 27 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Upheld for Violation of Land Use Plan

Numero d'incarto III 2020 27
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a municipal council's decision, upheld by the cantonal government, to dismiss an application for a building permit, based on the argument that the construction project did not comply with the relevant land use plan concerning building heights and setbacks. The court reasoned that the planning regulations established objective criteria for construction, and since the proposed building significantly exceeded the maximum height and did not adhere to the required setback distances as stipulated in the plan, the lower authorities correctly rejected the permit application because the project demonstrably violated mandatory spatial planning rules.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Upheld for Violation of Land Use Plan: The court reasoned that the planning regulations established objective criteria for construction, and since the proposed building significantly exceeded the maximum height and did not adhere to the required setback distances as stipulated in the plan, the lower authorities correctly rejected the permit application because the project demonstrably violated mandatory spatial planning rules.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
superamento dell'altezza massima licenza edilizia comunale utilizzazione del fondo norme per l'edilizia obiettivo della pianificazione del territorio revisione del piano regolatore Enteignungsrecht (formelle Enteignung) | Enteignungsrecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 27 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. September 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin \n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Gemeinderat D.________, 2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n