Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 212 • VG SZ III 2020 212 Generato dall'IA

Judicial Review of Firearm License Denial Based on Ongoing Safety Risk

Numero d'incarto III 2020 212
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual sought judicial review of a decision by an administrative body that denied a request for a firearm license, based on a prior finding of potential danger and insufficient justification for possessing the weapon, which the administrative body maintained despite the petitioner's argument of a changed situation and professional need. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the original assessment of potential danger remained valid due to the absence of new facts demonstrating sufficient reliability and a compelling necessity outweighing the public safety risk associated with issuing the license.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Judicial Review of Firearm License Denial Based on Ongoing Safety Risk: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the original assessment of potential danger remained valid due to the absence of new facts demonstrating sufficient reliability and a compelling necessity outweighing the public safety risk associated with issuing the license.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sindacato giurisdizionale valutazione dei rischi pericolo per l'incolumità pubblica decisione motivata organi di ricorso porto abusivo di armi

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible due to the nature of the decision being appealed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Determines the distribution of court costs for the unsuccessful appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 178
Firearm Confiscation Upheld Due to Criminal History and Psychiatric Evaluation
III 2022 58
Transportation Authority v. License Revocation Appeal
III 2018 218
Judicial Review of Precautionary Driving License Suspension
BEK 2019 9
Appeal Regarding Stay of License Decision Execution
III 2017 190
Judicial Review of Driving License Revocation

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

Used to declare the appeal inadmissible due to the nature of the decision being appealed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Determines the distribution of court costs for the unsuccessful appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 212 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Januar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n c/o. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. C.________, Abteilung Spezialdienste, \n Bahnhofstr. 7, Postfach 1212, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstr. 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Beigeladener, \n |\n

\n\n

\n