Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 173 • VG SZ III 2020 173 Generato dall'IA

Property Protection Designation Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2020 173
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A property owner challenged administrative decisions, first by a local municipal council and then by the cantonal government, which resulted in the designation of their property as subject to protection, impacting their planning and building rights. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the protection measure was legally sound because the public interest in preserving the object's cultural or historical significance, as determined by the relevant authorities, outweighed the individual interest of the property owner in unrestricted use or development, provided the designation complied with established legal and procedural requirements for such measures.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Property Protection Designation Appeal Dismissed: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the protection measure was legally sound because the public interest in preserving the object's cultural or historical significance, as determined by the relevant authorities, outweighed the individual interest of the property owner in unrestricted use or development, provided the designation complied with established legal and procedural requirements for such measures.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
beni culturali diritto di proprietà autorità comunali tutela legale proprietà immobiliare edificio pubblico Planungs- und Baurecht (Unterschutzstellung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 21
Building Protection Appeal Standing Dismissal
III 2017 126
Property Owner Standing in Building Permit Appeal
III 2016 191
Property Owner Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld
III 2021 135
Municipal Land Use Appeal Dismissed
III 2017 157
Heritage Organizations v. Municipality (Standing to Appeal Demolition Permit)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 173 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Arth, Rathausplatz 6, Postfach 263, 6415 Arth, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Unterschutzstellung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: