Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a decision made by the Child and Adult Protection Authority regarding protective measures for a minor, where the appellant, represented by counsel, sought to overturn the lower authority's ruling. The court's reasoning, derived from the context of the proceedings involving the authority and the appellant concerning the child's welfare, ultimately upheld or modified the decision based on the established legal standards for protective measures, as the specific facts and reasoning are not fully detailed but the action is an appeal against an authority's decision on protective measures.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Against Child Protection Authority Ruling on Protective Measures: The court's reasoning, derived from the context of the proceedings involving the authority and the appellant concerning the child's welfare, ultimately upheld or modified the decision based on the established legal standards for protective measures, as the specific facts and reasoning are not fully detailed but the action is an appeal against an authority's decision on protective measures.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 169 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Oktober 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz, |\n
\n\n
\n