Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 166 • VG SZ III 2020 166 Generato dall'IA

District Council Building Permit Retroactive Approval Challenge

Numero d'incarto III 2020 166
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioners challenged a decision by the district council, upheld by the cantonal higher authorities, which ordered the retroactive approval of a building permit and threatened enforcement measures, stemming from the construction of an extension that allegedly violated zoning and building regulations. The court reasoned that since the structure was built without the necessary authorization and subsequently challenged, the authorities were obligated to assess the situation under the applicable planning and building law; because the petitioners failed to demonstrate that the administrative decision was contrary to substantive or procedural law by not fulfilling the prerequisites for a retroactive permit or challenging the enforcement threat appropriately, the appeal against the order for reinstatement to the lawful state was dismissed.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Planungs- und Baurecht (Nachträgliche Baubewilligung; Wiederherstellung des rechtmässigen Zustandes; Vollstreckungsandrohung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia a posteriori approvazione dei piani impugnazione di decisioni amministrative prescrizioni di zona norme per l'edilizia autorizzazione all’esecuzione
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 126
Building Permit Approval Standing Challenge
III 2024 195
Zoning Dispute Over Building Permit Approval
III 2017 161
Building Permit Challenge Inadmissibility
III 2023 181
Appeal Against Building Permit Denial Lacks Standing Due to Existing Zoning Regulations
III 2021 92
Enforcement of Building Permit Procedure and Usage Halt Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 166 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Januar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n \n1. D.________, \n2. E.________, \n Beigeladene, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Nachträgliche Baubewilligung; Wiederherstellung des rechtmässigen Zustandes; Vollstreckungsandrohung) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: