Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 163 • VG SZ III 2020 163 Generato dall'IA

LLC Appeal on Zoning Regulations and Building Volume

Numero d'incarto III 2020 163
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A limited liability company appealed a decision by a municipal council, subsequently upheld by higher cantonal administrative bodies, concerning development rights, where the core issue was the interpretation and application of zoning regulations regarding the scope of permitted construction. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative decisions correctly interpreted the applicable spatial planning law, finding that the appellant's proposed construction exceeded the permitted building volume and adhered to the established planning standards, thus upholding the administrative bodies' denial of the building permit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; LLC Appeal on Zoning Regulations and Building Volume: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower administrative decisions correctly interpreted the applicable spatial planning law, finding that the appellant's proposed construction exceeded the permitted building volume and adhered to the established planning standards, thus upholding the administrative bodies' denial of the building permit.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prescrizioni di zona società a responsabilità limitata licenza edilizia comunale norme per l'edilizia imprese di costruzione portata della legge del contratto Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision was used to allocate the costs of the proceedings to the losing party.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 46
LLC v. Municipal Council Zoning Dispute
III 2021 107
Company v. Municipal Council (Building Permit Zoning Dispute)
III 2018 180
LLC Development Appeal Dismissed
III 2018 227
Appeal Against Municipal Zoning Decision Upheld
III 2019 71
Zoning Appeal Regarding Building Height and Setback Compliance

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision was used to allocate the costs of the proceedings to the losing party.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 163 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Januar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, \n Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n