Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 161 • VG SZ III 2020 161 Generato dall'IA

Agricultural Housing Need Denial Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2020 161
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a decision that denied the establishment of a residential unit, arguing that the property met the legal requirements for agricultural housing need, specifically concerning the need for housing for a full-time farm laborer. The court reasoned that while the property was functionally managed as a farm, the existing farm use did not generate sufficient agricultural profit or require the employment of a full-time worker, thus failing to establish the necessary statutory need for a separate agricultural residence under the relevant federal law concerning agricultural land.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Agricultural Housing Need Denial Appeal: The court reasoned that while the property was functionally managed as a farm, the existing farm use did not generate sufficient agricultural profit or require the employment of a full-time worker, thus failing to establish the necessary statutory need for a separate agricultural residence under the relevant federal law concerning agricultural land.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
utilizzazione agricola diritto fondiario fabbisogno abitativo destinazione ad uso abitativo subaffitto bene riservato
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 181
Appeal Against Denial of Agricultural Building Conversion to Residential Unit
III 2016 134
Appeal Regarding Denial of Agricultural Building Permit Upheld
III 2018 189
Building Permit Denial for Agricultural Land Dwelling
III 2019 29
Zoning Challenge to Agricultural Building Conversion Rejection Upheld
III 2021 60
Appeal Dismissed: Refusal to Grant Retrospective Building Permit for Unauthorized Agricultural Unit Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 161 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 31. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Landwirtschaft, Hirschistrasse 15, Postfach 5182, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Landund Forstwirtschaftsrecht (Feststellungsverfügung BGBB; landwirtschaftlicher Wohnraumbedarf) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: