Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 128 • VG SZ III 2020 128 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Naturalization Denial Based on Integration Criteria

Numero d'incarto III 2020 128
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An applicant appealed a local authority's decision denying ordinary naturalization, where the core issue was whether the applicant met the necessary criteria for integration and residency. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the initial authority's assessment regarding the applicant's insufficient integration into the community, as supported by established facts and criteria, was not demonstrably arbitrary or contrary to law, thereby affirming the discretionary power exercised by the local authority in such matters.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Naturalization Denial Based on Integration Criteria: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the initial authority's assessment regarding the applicant's insufficient integration into the community, as supported by established facts and criteria, was not demonstrably arbitrary or contrary to law, thereby affirming the discretionary power exercised by the local authority in such matters.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto alla naturalizzazione criteri di valutazione assoggettamento nel diritto degli stranieri divieto di discriminazione fondata sulla cittadinanza determinazione del domicilio civile integrazione dei migranti ordentliche Einbürgerung | Einbürgerungen
Generato dall'IA
III 2016 140
Applicants v. Local Authority on Naturalization Rejection and Procedural Error
III 2017 192
Family Naturalization Appeal Regarding Discretionary Power and Integration
III 2017 231
Appeal Against Denial of Residence Permits Based on Insufficient Integration and Means
III 2017 93
Appeal Against Naturalization Rejection Based on Unemployment Benefits
III 2021 86
Applicants v. Municipality on Citizenship Denial

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 128 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Oktober 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Gemeinde C.________, Einbürgerungsbehörde, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n ordentliche Einbürgerung |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: