Child and Adult Protective Services Appeal
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA lower court decision regarding child and adult protective services was challenged when the appellant, represented by counsel, contested the ruling made by the responsible authority. The court's reasoning for upholding the decision, or rendering its own verdict, would be based on the relevant statutes concerning the protection of minors and incapacitated adults, applying the established legal standards to the specific facts presented regarding the appellant's situation and the necessity or appropriateness of the prior protective measures.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAChild and Adult Protective Services Appeal: The court's reasoning for upholding the decision, or rendering its own verdict, would be based on the relevant statutes concerning the protection of minors and incapacitated adults, applying the established legal standards to the specific facts presented regarding the appellant's situation and the necessity or appropriateness of the prior protective measures.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 127 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. September 2020 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Christina Zehnder, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, , \n vertreten durch MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) \n …, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n
\n