Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 125 • VG SZ III 2020 125 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Asylum and Humanitarian Residency Denial

Numero d'incarto III 2020 125
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against the denial of an asylum application and a subsequent refusal of a residence permit based on humanitarian grounds, where the appellants, two individuals, contested the finding that the first appellant's life or freedom was not in danger in their country of origin and that no other grounds for granting asylum or humanitarian residency existed. The court reasoned that the evidence presented, including expert opinions, sufficiently supported the lower authorities' determination that the appellant's fear of persecution was not credible according to the established factual basis and that the narrow criteria for a humanitarian residence permit were not met, thus dismissing the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Asylum and Humanitarian Residency Denial: The court reasoned that the evidence presented, including expert opinions, sufficiently supported the lower authorities' determination that the appellant's fear of persecution was not credible according to the established factual basis and that the narrow criteria for a humanitarian residence permit were not met, thus dismissing the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivo d'asilo timore di persecuzione permesso di dimora base fattuale revoca della qualità di rifugiato domanda d'asilo di cittadino nigeriano

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2023 188
Asylum Denial Upheld Despite Political Persecution Claim
III 2018 71
Asylum Denial Affirmation on Credibility Grounds
III 2019 13
Asylum Appeal Dismissed on Insufficient Evidence of Persecution
III 2024 178
Appeal Dismissed: Residency Permit Refusal Under Asylum Act Hardship Provision
III 2021 206
Asylum Rejection Affirmed Due to Insufficient Individualized Evidence

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 125 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Februar 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, der Beschwerdeführer Ziff. 2 vertreten durch die Beschwerde­führerin Ziff. 1 und diese vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n