Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 12 • VG SZ III 2020 12 Generato dall'IA

Representative Substitution Failure in Appeal Dismissal

Numero d'incarto III 2020 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A deceased party's legal representative filed an appeal against the municipal council, a cantonal development office, and the cantonal government regarding a previous administrative decision. The court dismissed the appeal because the representative failed to properly substitute the deceased appellant within the legally prescribed timeframe following the appellant's death, rendering the appeal inadmissible due to a procedural defect.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Representative Substitution Failure in Appeal Dismissal: The court dismissed the appeal because the representative failed to properly substitute the deceased appellant within the legally prescribed timeframe following the appellant's death, rendering the appeal inadmissible due to a procedural defect.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
de cujus licenziamento amministrativo vizio di procedura nomina del rappresentante sostituzione volgare diritto alla sostituzione della prestazione Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung für Fenster) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2019 60
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Appoint Representative and Pay Court Fees
ZK2 2020 58
Estate Representative Appointment Appeal Denial
ZK2 2024 8
Estate Administration Appointment Jurisdiction Appeal
BEK 2020 191
Appeal on Legal Standing Dismissed for Inadmissibility
STK 2019 55
Appeal Dismissal Due to Withdrawal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 12 III 2020 18 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Oktober 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________ (verstorben am 18.01.2020), \n Beschwerdeführerin (Verfahren III 2020 12), |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Lachen, Alter Schulhausplatz 1, Postfach 263, 8853 Lachen, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. F.________, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen (Verfahren III 2020 12+18), |\n

\n\n

\n