Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2020 110 • VG SZ III 2020 110 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations

Numero d'incarto III 2020 110
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision concerning a building permit application where the applicants sought authorization to construct an addition to an existing building. The court reasoned that the lower administrative decision to deny the permit was justified because the proposed construction failed to comply with established spatial planning regulations regarding building lines and setbacks, which were deemed necessary to maintain the established character of the area and ensure adequate public access and light.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Building Permit Due to Non-Compliance with Spatial Planning Regulations: The court reasoned that the lower administrative decision to deny the permit was justified because the proposed construction failed to comply with established spatial planning regulations regarding building lines and setbacks, which were deemed necessary to maintain the established character of the area and ensure adequate public access and light.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla licenza edilizia approvazione dei piani allineamento non attribuzione a una zona edificio pubblico principi pianificatori Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 87
Local Authority Zoning Compliance Appeal
III 2019 8
Building Permit Denial Compliance with Zoning Regulations
III 2019 100
Permit Denial Upheld on Spatial Planning Grounds
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2018 211
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Rejection Based on Land Use Regulations

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2020 110 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. September 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Karl Gasser, Richter Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ und B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n 1. Bezirksrat Küssnacht, Seeplatz 2/3, Postfach 176, 6403 Küssnacht, 2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, |\n

\n\n

\n