Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 92 • VG SZ III 2019 92 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Asylum Review and Deportation Affirmation

Numero d'incarto III 2019 92
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned a judicial review of a decision by a cantonal governmental body and the cantonal migration authority that denied asylum and ordered the deportation of three Ghanaian nationals. The applicants challenged the decision, arguing that their initial application was not adequately assessed under the relevant legal framework, particularly concerning the conditions in their home country that might preclude safe return. The court reasoned that the prior decision adequately addressed the known security situation and the applicants' submissions failed to present new or relevant facts that would substantially alter the assessment of the risk upon return, thus affirming the negative asylum decision and the deportation order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Cantonal Asylum Review and Deportation Affirmation: The applicants challenged the decision, arguing that their initial application was not adequately assessed under the relevant legal framework, particularly concerning the conditions in their home country that might preclude safe return. The court reasoned that the prior decision adequately addressed the known security situation and the applicants' submissions failed to present new or relevant facts that would substantially alter the assessment of the risk upon return, thus affirming the negative asylum decision and the deportation order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
esame della domanda d'asilo rischio migratorio migrazione di ritorno sindacato giurisdizionale decisione quadro allontanamento legittimo Ausländerrecht (Familiennachzug) | Ausländerrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The provision dictates the order regarding the payment of court costs for the unsuccessful party.
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 68
Cantonal Government Refusal to Rule on Hardship Residence Permit
III 2022 174
Appeal of Foreign National's Residence Status Denial
III 2023 82
Appeal Against Refusal of Residency Permit and Expulsion Order
III 2020 125
Appeal Against Asylum and Humanitarian Residency Denial
III 2020 59
Petitioners v. Cantonal Migration Office and Government (2020)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The provision dictates the order regarding the payment of court costs for the unsuccessful party.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. AA.________, \n2. BA.________, Staatsangehörige von Ghana, \n3. BB.________, Staatsangehörige von Ghana, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. D.________ \n |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Amt für Migration (AFM), Steistegstrasse 13, Postfach 454, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n