Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 9 • VG SZ III 2019 9 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Government Decision on Building Permit Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2019 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The petitioners challenged a decision by the cantonal government upholding a district council's refusal to grant a building permit for an event bar structure, arguing that the structure, intended for temporary use during events, was exempt from standard building permit requirements because it only partially encroached on a protected area and was of temporary nature. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the structure's presence, even if temporary, constituted a building activity requiring a permit under spatial planning law, and the structure's impact, including partial encroachment into a protected zone, justified the refusal since the necessary legal prerequisites for an exception were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Cantonal Government Decision on Building Permit Upheld: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the structure's presence, even if temporary, constituted a building activity requiring a permit under spatial planning law, and the structure's impact, including partial encroachment into a protected zone, justified the refusal since the necessary legal prerequisites for an exception were not met.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia zona edificabile divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico autorizzazione parziale approvazione dei piani decisione motivata Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung: Event-Baracke) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs were imposed on the appellants according to this provision.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2019 41
Building Permit Condition Challenge Dismissed
III 2021 37
Municipality v. Cantonal Decisions on Building Permit Rejection
III 2023 96
Building Permit Refusal Upheld on Zoning Grounds
III 2020 27
Building Permit Denial Upheld for Violation of Land Use Plan

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs were imposed on the appellants according to this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 9 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n3. C.________, \n4. D.________, \n5. E.________, \n6. F.________, \n7. G.________, \n8. H.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. I.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung: Event-Baracke) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: