Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 86 • VG SZ III 2019 86 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Representation Guardianship Establishment

Numero d'incarto III 2019 86
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision by the Child and Adult Protection Authority to establish a representation guardianship for an individual. The appellant contested the necessity and scope of this measure, arguing that less intrusive alternatives were available or sufficient. The court reasoned that the existing factual circumstances demonstrated a need for protective measures because the individual was unable to adequately manage their affairs, thereby justifying the establishment of the representation guardianship as the necessary legal instrument to safeguard the person's interests and well-being.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Errichtung einer Vertretungsbeistandschaft nach Art. 394 i.V.m. Art. 395 ZGB/Wahl der Beistandsperson) | Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rappresentanza nella curatela autorità di protezione degli adulti messa in pericolo del bene del figlio estensione della protezione procedura di gratuito patrocinio legittimazione a ricorrere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
The provision was used to rule on the costs of the federal appeal.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 176
Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2020 174
Guardianship Over Power of Attorney Due to Inadequate Management
III 2018 204
Appeal of Protective Trusteeship Establishment

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

The provision was used to rule on the costs of the federal appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 86 III 2019 123 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. Juli 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n zurzeit c/o B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) D.________, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Errichtung einer Ver­tretungsbeistandschaft nach