Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2019 8 • VG SZ III 2019 8 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Compliance with Zoning Regulations

Numero d'incarto III 2019 8
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner sought judicial review after local and cantonal planning and building authorities denied a building permit for a construction project, which was subsequently upheld by the cantonal government council. The court considered whether the construction project complied with planning and building regulations, specifically addressing the local spatial development plan and relevant cantonal directives. The court reasoned that the proposed structure did not conform to the established setback lines and height restrictions stipulated in the relevant zoning regulations, thus affirming the lower authorities' rejection of the building permit application based on non-compliance with mandated spatial planning parameters.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Denial Compliance with Zoning Regulations: The court considered whether the construction project complied with planning and building regulations, specifically addressing the local spatial development plan and relevant cantonal directives. The court reasoned that the proposed structure did not conform to the established setback lines and height restrictions stipulated in the relevant zoning regulations, thus affirming the lower authorities' rejection of the building permit application based on non-compliance with mandated spatial planning parameters.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
conformità alla licenza edilizia piano di utilizzazione altezza della costruzione allineamento disciplina urbanistica sindacato giurisdizionale Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 8 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Bauund Umweltbehörde, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, 8840 Einsiedeln, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: