Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2019 71 • VG SZ III 2019 71 Generato dall'IA

Zoning Appeal Regarding Building Height and Setback Compliance

Numero d'incarto III 2019 71
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner challenged a zoning decision regarding a property, arguing that a municipal council's approval of a construction project, upheld by subsequent administrative bodies, violated planning law concerning building heights and setback requirements, particularly questioning whether the existing structures qualified for the existing building zone's allowances. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authorities correctly interpreted the relevant cantonal spatial planning regulations and determined that the planned construction adhered to the established height limits and setback rules applicable to the specific property based on its existing situation and the pertinent planning instruments.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Zoning Appeal Regarding Building Height and Setback Compliance: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower authorities correctly interpreted the relevant cantonal spatial planning regulations and determined that the planned construction adhered to the established height limits and setback rules applicable to the specific property based on its existing situation and the pertinent planning instruments.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
altezza massima dell'edificio conformità alla zona zona edificabile approvazione dei piani distanze dal confine legittimazione a contestare licenza Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the judicial costs of the federal court proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 71 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. Oktober 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Wollerau, Hauptstrasse 15, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Bezirksrat Höfe, Bahnhofstrasse 4, Postfach 124, 8832 Wollerau, \n3. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n4. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n