Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 6 • VG SZ III 2019 6 Generato dall'IA

Expropriation for Utility Easement Connection

Numero d'incarto III 2019 6
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The dispute concerned the expropriation of a right-of-way easement across one property to facilitate the connection of another property to the public utility network. The property owner subject to expropriation appealed the decision that upheld the validity of the expropriation for the utility connection. The court reasoned that the established necessity for the right-of-way to ensure the proper connection of the benefiting property to the public network constituted a valid public interest justifying the expropriation under relevant law, provided fair compensation was guaranteed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Expropriation for Utility Easement Connection: The property owner subject to expropriation appealed the decision that upheld the validity of the expropriation for the utility connection. The court reasoned that the established necessity for the right-of-way to ensure the proper connection of the benefiting property to the public network constituted a valid public interest justifying the expropriation under relevant law, provided fair compensation was guaranteed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
servitù espropriazione pubblica utilità diritto di proprietà prestazione di diritto pubblico appropriazione indebita di beni demaniali Enteignungsrecht (Enteignung für Durchleitungsrecht) | Enteignungsrecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 206
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Public Right-of-Way Easement
III 2024 45
Property Owner v. Cantonal Valuation Commission: Easement Compensation Valuation
III 2022 144
Expropriation of Right-of-Way for Sidewalk Upheld Against Business Impact Claims
ZK1 2020 14
Property Owner v. Neighboring Property Owners (Access Route Enforcement Costs)
III 2015 220
Land Expropriation Compensation Valuation Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 6 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 18. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch RA lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. C.________, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. D.________, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Enteignungsrecht (Enteignung für Durchleitungsrecht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: