Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2019 47 • VG SZ III 2019 47 Generato dall'IA

Corporate Entity v. Municipal Authorities (Advertising Permit Denial)

Numero d'incarto III 2019 47
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A corporate entity challenged the denial of a building permit for an advertising banner by various municipal and cantonal authorities. The petitioner argued that the initial permit, granted for a similar structure, established a precedent that should have applied to the current application. The court reasoned that the previous authorization was for a different type of advertising structure with distinct visual characteristics, meaning it did not create a legally binding precedent for the current application, thus upholding the denial based on applicable zoning and building regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Corporate Entity v. Municipal Authorities (Advertising Permit Denial): The petitioner argued that the initial permit, granted for a similar structure, established a precedent that should have applied to the current application. The court reasoned that the previous authorization was for a different type of advertising structure with distinct visual characteristics, meaning it did not create a legally binding precedent for the current application, thus upholding the denial based on applicable zoning and building regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia comunale legittimazione a contestare licenza prescrizioni di zona norme per l'edilizia persona giuridica pubblicità dell'appalto Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung Werbebanner) | Planungs- und Baurecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs were imposed on the appellant in the final order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 47 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juni 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Dr. oec. Andreas Risi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Ingenbohl, Parkstrasse 1, Postfach 253, 6440 Brunnen, \n 2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, 3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung Werbebanner) |\n \n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: