Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 41 • VG SZ III 2019 41 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Condition Challenge Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2019 41
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A company and an individual challenged conditions attached to a building permit by the municipal building authority and upheld by the cantonal government, related to planning and building law. The court reasoned that the conditions imposed, concerning the required removal of existing structures prior to construction, were legally sound because they were directly related to the development plan and served to ensure the new construction complied with planning regulations, thus rejecting the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Condition Challenge Dismissed: The court reasoned that the conditions imposed, concerning the required removal of existing structures prior to construction, were legally sound because they were directly related to the development plan and served to ensure the new construction complied with planning regulations, thus rejecting the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
oneri della licenza edilizia imprese di costruzione disciplina urbanistica divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico polizia delle costruzioni incentivazione immobiliare
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 199
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2021 98
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Dismissed
III 2018 97
Property Owner v. Cantonal Authorities Regarding Building Permit Conditions
III 2018 127
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2019 9
Cantonal Government Decision on Building Permit Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 41 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. Juli 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________ AG, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Baubehörde Wollerau, Postfach 335, 8832 Wollerau, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Auflagen zu einer Baubewilligung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: