Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 4 • VG SZ III 2019 4 Generato dall'IA

Pathway Lighting Permit Appeal Affirmation

Numero d'incarto III 2019 4
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two parties appealed decisions concerning a building permit for pathway lighting, specifically challenging approvals granted by local and cantonal authorities. The court reasoned that the initial decision regarding the building permit for the pathway lighting was correct, affirming the prior rulings by the lower instances.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Pathway Lighting Permit Appeal Affirmation: The court reasoned that the initial decision regarding the building permit for the pathway lighting was correct, affirming the prior rulings by the lower instances.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza di costruzione decisione motivata legge sui percorsi pedonali eccezioni processuali domanda confermativa di accesso ente locale Planungs- und Baurecht (Baubewilligung Wegbeleuchtung) | Planungs- und Baurecht
Generato dall'IA
III 2020 197
Appeal on Building Permit Procedure and Standing for Footpath Expansion
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2020 190
Building Permit Rejection Appeal
III 2018 74
Appeal Concerning Construction Permit Legality
III 2023 20
Petitioner's Appealability of Partial Administrative Decision Regarding Building Permit

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 4 III 2019 12 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. September 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer (im Verfahren III 2019 4), \n |\n

\n|\n |\n B.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin (im Verfahren III 2019 12), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Gemeinderat Morschach, Schulstrasse 6, 6443 Morschach, \n2. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n4. A.________, \n Beschwerdegegner (im Verfahren III 2019 12) \n5. B.________, \n Beschwerdegegnerin (im Verfahren III 2019 4), \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. C.________, \n6. D.________, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n|\n Gegenstand |\n Planungsund Baurecht (Baubewilligung Wegbeleuchtung) |\n \n\n

\n

Sachverhalt: