Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 3 • VG SZ III 2019 3 Generato dall'IA

Consortium v. District Council (Planning Appeal)

Numero d'incarto III 2019 3
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A consortium of companies, forming a simple partnership, appealed a decision by a district council concerning a planning matter. The court's reasoning, although the specific subject of the dispute is not detailed, upheld the previous ruling, suggesting that the consortium failed to establish grounds for overturning the lower authority's decision regarding the planning regulation or action in question.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Consortium v. District Council (Planning Appeal): The court's reasoning, although the specific subject of the dispute is not detailed, upheld the previous ruling, suggesting that the consortium failed to establish grounds for overturning the lower authority's decision regarding the planning regulation or action in question.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
consorzio società semplice oggetto della lite decisioni di associazioni di imprese dovere di collaborazione del contribuente deroga alla licenza edilizia
Generato dall'IA
III 2024 189
Planning Appeal Against Administrative Decision and Corporate Interests
III 2024 162
Appeal on Planning and Building Law Regarding Development Plan
III 2022 127
Planning Authority Decision Appeal
III 2021 107
Company v. Municipal Council (Building Permit Zoning Dispute)
III 2019 77
Appeal Against Planning Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 3 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n ARGE A.________ (einfache Gesellschaft), bestehend aus: \n \n1. B.________AG, \n2. C.________AG, \n3. D.________AG, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch RA Dr. E.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n 1. Bezirksrat Einsiedeln, Hauptstrasse 78, Postfach 161, \n 8840 Einsiedeln, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n