Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 28 • VG SZ III 2019 28 Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Expert Opinion Consideration

Numero d'incarto III 2019 28
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged a governmental decision concerning the granting of a building permit, arguing that the administrative authority failed to properly consider relevant expert opinions regarding potential hazards associated with the proposed construction location. The court found that the administrative review process adequately addressed the expert assessments, concluding that the authorities were not obligated to follow the recommendation of a specific expert opinion when other relevant factors and expert reports supported the final decision, thus affirming the lower court's ruling against the appellant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Building Permit Appeal Regarding Expert Opinion Consideration: The court found that the administrative review process adequately addressed the expert assessments, concluding that the authorities were not obligated to follow the recommendation of a specific expert opinion when other relevant factors and expert reports supported the final decision, thus affirming the lower court's ruling against the appellant.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
perizia amministrativa licenza edilizia approvazione dei piani riesame di una decisione precedente sentenze interpretative controllo dei lavori
Generato dall'IA
III 2017 226
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Dismissed
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
III 2024 139
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2019 162
Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 28 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 24. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Volkswirtschaftsdepartement, Bahnhofstrasse 15, \n Postfach 1180, 6431 Schwyz, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, \n |\n

\n\n

\n