Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
III 2019 177 • VG SZ III 2019 177 Generato dall'IA

Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Due to Reckless Driving

Numero d'incarto III 2019 177
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a challenge against a provisional withdrawal of a driving license ordered by the traffic office as a security measure in road traffic law. The petitioner appealed this decision, which was based on observed driving behavior, but the court upheld the provisional measure because the assessment of the facts, which indicated a potential risk to public safety due to reckless driving, provided sufficient grounds for immediate action to secure road traffic, justifying the precautionary measure even before a final administrative finding was made.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Provisional Withdrawal of Driving License Due to Reckless Driving: The petitioner appealed this decision, which was based on observed driving behavior, but the court upheld the provisional measure because the assessment of the facts, which indicated a potential risk to public safety due to reckless driving, provided sufficient grounds for immediate action to secure road traffic, justifying the precautionary measure even before a final administrative finding was made.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre diritto della circolazione stradale guida recidiva in stato di ebbrezza esame d'idoneità alla guida ritiro dell'azione giudiziaria confisca del veicolo a motore Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the federal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 177 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. November 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Dennis Feusi, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (vorsorglicher Sicherungsentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: