Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 176 • VG SZ III 2019 176 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment

Numero d'incarto III 2019 176
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A higher court reviewed an appeal against a lower authority's decision to establish a protective guardianship for an adult, concerning matters of adult protective services. The appellant contested the establishment of this guardianship, leading to the judicial review of the necessity and appropriateness of the measure ordered by the initial authority. The court's reasoning, leading to its verdict, would have involved an assessment of the adult's capacity, the need for legal representation or assistance in their affairs, and whether the established measure was in the person's best interest and met the statutory requirements for imposing such a restrictive measure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Adult Protective Guardianship Establishment: The appellant contested the establishment of this guardianship, leading to the judicial review of the necessity and appropriateness of the measure ordered by the initial authority. The court's reasoning, leading to its verdict, would have involved an assessment of the adult's capacity, the need for legal representation or assistance in their affairs, and whether the established measure was in the person's best interest and met the statutory requirements for imposing such a restrictive measure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rappresentanza nella curatela sindacato giurisdizionale procedura di protezione degli adulti godimento dei diritti civili requisito legale autorità preposta all'assistenza giudiziaria
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision
III 2019 86
Appeal Against Representation Guardianship Establishment
III 2022 86
Appeal Against Protective Assistance Arrangement for Adult
III 2018 204
Appeal of Protective Trusteeship Establishment
III 2020 73
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 176 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 19. Dezember 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) B.________, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzrecht (Errichtung einer Vertretungsbeistandschaft) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: