Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 162 • VG SZ III 2019 162 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld

Numero d'incarto III 2019 162
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a governmental decision, specifically originating from a construction commission and subsequently reviewed by the cantonal governing council and the federal office for spatial development, concerning a building project. The court reasoned that the administrative decision being challenged was valid because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower administrative bodies violated substantive or procedural law when evaluating the building permit application, thereby upholding the decisions made by the administrative bodies.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Construction Permit Denial Upheld: The court reasoned that the administrative decision being challenged was valid because the appellant failed to demonstrate that the lower administrative bodies violated substantive or procedural law when evaluating the building permit application, thereby upholding the decisions made by the administrative bodies.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia controllo della procedura approvazione dei piani motivazione nel merito divieto di costruzione di diritto pubblico legittimazione a ricorrere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
III 2019 21
Appeal Against Building Permit Refusal Upheld
II 2024 91
Construction Permit Denial Appeal Upheld
III 2018 96
Appeal Against Building Permit Upheld
III 2018 127
Appeal Against Building Permit Dismissed
III 2018 160
Property Developer Appeal of Building Permit Denial Upheld

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the federal appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 162 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Juli 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin Irene Thalmann, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________: \n \n1. Dr. B.________, \n2. C.________ AG, \n bzw. ab 24. Dezember 2019: D.________ AG \n vertreten durch RA Dr. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Baukommission der Gemeinde Schwyz, Herrengasse 23, Postfach 34, 6431 Schwyz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. E.________, \n2. Regierungsrat des Kantons Schwyz, Bahnhofstrasse 9, \n Postfach 1260, 6431 Schwyz, \n3. Amt für Raumentwicklung ARE, Bahnhofstrasse 14, \n Postfach 1186, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanzen, |\n

\n\n

\n