Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 16 • VG SZ III 2019 16 Generato dall'IA

Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Appeal

Numero d'incarto III 2019 16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a challenge to a decision by a child and adult protection authority, with the appellant contesting the ruling made by that authority, which was also a party to the appeal, alongside an interested third party. The court reached its verdict on March 25, 2019, following deliberations by a panel including a Vice President, two Judges, and a Court Clerk, without providing the specific details of the challenged decision or the reasoning for the final judgment in the provided excerpt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Appeal: The court reached its verdict on March 25, 2019, following deliberations by a panel including a Vice President, two Judges, and a Court Clerk, without providing the specific details of the challenged decision or the reasoning for the final judgment in the provided excerpt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità di protezione degli adulti procedura di protezione dei minori perizia giuridica legittimazione a ricorrere diritti del bambino diritto di visita
Generato dall'IA
III 2022 33
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision
III 2020 170
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Decision Upheld
III 2018 178
Appeal of Child and Adult Protection Authority Intervention Decision
III 2020 6
Appeal Regarding Child Custody and Protection Authority Decision
III 2018 101
Appeal Against Child and Adult Protection Authority Guardianship Decision

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 16 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Kindesund Erwachsenenschutzbehörde (KESB) Ausserschwyz, Eichenstrasse 2, 8808 Pfäffikon, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n