Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III 2019 143 • VG SZ III 2019 143 Generato dall'IA

Petitioner v. Transportation Authority: Driving License Withdrawal Appeal Dismissed

Numero d'incarto III 2019 143
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A petitioner appealed a decision by the transportation authority to withdraw their driving license following a traffic infraction. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative authority acted correctly within its discretionary powers when it determined that the gravity of the offense warranted the withdrawal of the license, upholding the initial decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Petitioner v. Transportation Authority: Driving License Withdrawal Appeal Dismissed: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the administrative authority acted correctly within its discretionary powers when it determined that the gravity of the offense warranted the withdrawal of the license, upholding the initial decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca della licenza condurre autorità amministrativa uso di veicolo a motore multa disciplinare decisione motivata tacita revoca dell'opposizione Strassenverkehrsrecht (Führerausweisentzug) | Strassenverkehrsrecht

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
III 2018 196
Motorist Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Upheld
III 2019 188
Appeal of Driving License Withdrawal Based on Traffic Offenses
III 2021 91
Traffic License Withdrawal Appeal Upheld
III 2017 43
Motorist License Withdrawal Upheld on Traffic Offense
III 2019 196
Driver License Withdrawal Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n III 2019 143 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 25. September 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Ruth Mikšovic-Waldis, Richterin Monica Huber-Landolt, Richterin |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Verkehrsamt, Schlagstrasse 82, Postfach 3214, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Strassenverkehrsrecht (Führerausweisentzug) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: